All Kinds of Good Stuff

Yesterday I had nothing at all and broke my nice run of posts.  Today, cool stuff galore.

Project Update #26: Torment: Tides of Numenera    I missed the poll somehow because I would have voted against Turn-based combat for all of the reasons listed in their update:

Comment #1: Turn-Based combat can be tedious

If one were to take Planescape: Torment and, changing nothing else, switch to TB combat, the result would be miserable for many. You’d be stopped midstride in every Hive back alley to perform the same boring actions on meaningless thugs and zombies.

This isn’t what we’re going to do.

Turn-based combat certainly can be tedious, but that comes down to encounter design. As we stated during the Kickstarter, Torment will have no trash mobs—those hordes of filler battles that require little thought from the player. That type of gameplay is at odds with our emphasis on the story and character development, so each Crisis in Torment will be hand-crafted. It will have narrative relevance and consequences. We’ll iterate on them until each one is a quality encounter and provides the experience we seek for that moment in the game.

If any combat situation in Torment were tedious, it wouldn’t be because it’s turn-based. It would be because we failed in our goal. And our Crises aren’t just combat. They contain exploration, dialogue, and time-relevant actions and events that can exist outside of combat, like pursuits, environmental puzzles, and application of special skills. You’re going to have to work throughout the game toward your goals, and the Crisis concept is a primary way that we put your intentions to the test.

We understand the importance to you of combat not being tedious. Emphasis on encounter design is important for any CRPG, but for Torment, the bar will be even higher – we believe that through well designed encounters, and extensive gameplay iteration on them, we’ll be able to address the majority of the concerns expressed by those who favored RTwP.

Comment #2: Turn-Based combat can break immersion

“Immersion” is a tricky term that can mean a lot of things, but generally this comment is referring to the jarring sense a player gets when they’re walking through a town and suddenly the whole world stops because, say, a feral dog saw them coming down the street.

Again, this isn’t what we’re going to do. In general, we don’t plan to “surprise” you with a Crisis. Through the design of the areas and the pacing of the game, you’ll know when and where combat is a possibility. The situation will feel tense and in some cases, you will be explicitly initiating the Crisis. This doesn’t mean we won’t ever ambush you, of course, but if we do, it will be very deliberate and not an arbitrary event.

We get that you don’t want to be pulled out of the game in this way and we’ll look for ways to keep you in control and prevent Crises from disrupting the normal flow of the game.

That said, Torment isn’t an action game. Real time doesn’t pass in conversations, for example – you have as much time as you want to decide your choice. And while exploration occurs in real-time, it won’t include twitch elements. All of your decision-making throughout the game will consistently be free from real-time considerations. Torment is a game about thinking and deliberation and will not have any actual time pressure, so turn-based combat will maintain a more consistent feel.

Comment #2a: Turn-Based combat isn’t realistic

A variation of the concern about immersion is that TB gameplay isn’t realistic. In a real battle, you don’t patiently observe while your opponents orderly take turns one at a time.

This is true, but the lack of realism is inherent in most videogame combat and gameplay (again, turn-based conversations come to mind), and RTwP combat isn’t immune to this issue. What we strive for isn’t realism, but creating an immersive experience that allows you to suspend your disbelief. In other words, realism is not at the core of Torment’s party-based combat.

That said, we will strive to make the combats as dynamic and visceral as possible – attacked characters will animate appropriately when struck instead of standing lifelessly, for example, or perhaps having readied actions such as overwatch or interrupts to take actions on the opponent’s turn. We will maintain tension and flow, creating the sense that you are in actual danger and making your tactical and strategic decisions matter.

Comment #3: Controlling the entire party in Turn-Based can be boring

The idea behind this concern is that if only one character in your party is relevant to the combat (e.g., it’s in a narrow passageway or a specific skill/weapon is needed for some aspect of it, etc.) then gameplay gets bogged down. It’s not fun to have to skip most of your characters’ turns, cycling back to the one character who can actually do something.

This problem also comes down to encounter design, and we’ll be paying close attention to this aspect in our specific Crisis designs. Strong support of ranged combat will help, as melee-focused battles can exacerbate this problem. The Numenera rules also help here because skills, while beneficial, generally aren’t required to accomplish specific tasks, and Effort can be expended to give any character a better chance of success at tasks outside their character build. Adam discussed how this works in Update 21 (in the context of dialogue, though it applies to Crisis gameplay as well), but we’ll copy it here again so you don’t have to search for it.

Using skills will be different, too (side note: I say “will,” but we’re still in pre-production, so any of this can change). Say there’s a difficult task you want to attempt—lying to a prison guard or deciphering the text on an ancient puzzle box. Typically, in D&D-style RPGs for example, if you don’t have the associated skill, your chances of success are very low, or you might not be able to attempt the task at all. In Numenera, all such tasks are treated the same, and anyone can try them. Training in a related skill or skills will lower the difficulty of the task, but even if you’re untrained, you can still apply Effort.

Effort is a concept from the Numenera tabletop game. Essentially you spend points out of the appropriate stat pool (Might, Speed, or Intellect) to lower the difficulty of a task. The idea is, even if you’ve never been trained in lock picking, a very smart or dexterous character can, with some Effort, increase their chances of cracking a lock.

Your stat pools are renewable with rest. And of course, all of this is balanced. If you’re trying to crack a combination lock created by a culture that died out millions of years ago, which requires a combination of smells rather than integers, well . . . you’d have to have a high-level character specialized in the task, who spent all the Intellect they had on Effort, just to make the task possible. That character would still have to roll ridiculously well.

Effort provides more options to customize your character and tackle obstacles. If there’s a task you want to attempt—even if it’s something normally contrary to your character build—you still have a chance of succeeding if you can use enough Effort. On the other hand, someone who has trained or specialized in that sort of task will have a greater chance of success, and will maintain that edge in similar tasks throughout the game.

Note also that party members can “assist” others in particular skill-based tasks, boosting their chances for success.

In short, we’re fully aware that cycling can be a painful way to play, and that this aspect of gameplay is important to you, and we’ll design the Crises to keep your entire party engaged.

Comment #4: You should implement both RTwP and TB and make it a gameplay option

This solution may sound ideal, but it wouldn’t give anybody what they really want. Area and encounter design needs of the two systems are very different. Designing for both would dilute the quality of the encounters for one or both systems, and most likely require so much time and resources as to impact the rest of the game. In a deep RPG like ours, where combat isn’t even the focus, trying to implement two combat systems would lead to an inferior game across the board.

Comment #5: Planescape: Torment had Real-Time with Pause combat, so the new Torment should too

This is a reasonable perspective and valid point of view. Shouldn’t we stick with what made the original great?

But is RTwP combat what made Planescape: Torment great? For some of you, the combat may have been an important part of your PST experience, and we hope that you’ll find the combat in Torment: Tides of Numenera to be at least equally enjoyable. But we don’t think PST’s combat system was what most players loved about the game.

We believe PST is considered one of the greatest RPGs of all-time, not because its combat was Real-Time w/ Pause, but because of its emphasis on the narrative and on role-playing your character.


Neverwinter’s new expansion Shadowmantle has gone live.  this includes a new hunter/ranger character.  You can have two free characters there and I like my cleric so I will kill off the mage to make one of these.  I shall let you know what I think.

neverwinter shadowmantle

Broken Sword 5  The Serpents Curse has been released.  Adventure/puzzle fans will enjoy this which is being released episodically.   A little pricey for episodes one and 2 (one is out now, 2 to be released in early 2014) at $19.00 from the good folks at GOG and elsewhere.

Broken Sword 5

What I’m Playing

Not that you care but la la la I write what I want to here don’t I?

World of Warcraft  Working on getting all 11 characters and their crafts to max on Blackwater.  Can’t abandon them now.  Archaeology is a killer.  Picked a character on two different servers to be my level 90s there.  Although I think that the Insta-90 is a good thing for others, I can easily crunch two characters along. My Blackwater characters have taught me all I need to know about scooting through this game and leveling up.

Rift  As part of my Dungeon Challenge I’m starting by getting a character to level 10 on all three games.  I was at level 8 here already, so once I played a bit I was there at level 10 in a trice.  Interesting game. Lots going on at all times.  I wanted to jump into an Instant Dungeon at level 10, but no.   She’s the character who had the problem with her head becoming detached.  So embarrassing.

Guild Wars 2   I started off with a Sylvari Ranger who I thought would be like a nice bow specialist and she could whap whap her way to the 10th level.  Just dead too much for my tastes.  So, I thought to try another character type.  I chose an Asura Engineer and she is the cutie of the universe.  She looks like a floppy little rag doll when she runs.  I traded up weapons from a pistol to a rifle and was surprised when my skill bars changed completely.  I thought I’d pick up a new weapon along the way but I haven’t. I’ve arrived at a place with a bunch of crafting stations and I wonder if I’m expected to make my own next gun.  Hope not because I’ve been ruthless with inventory space and have sold everything, including crafting materials, that I couldn’t use.   I need lots of money for repairs, though I’m not dead dead dead usually, unless I get a boss type mob.  I noticed the Sylvari area had lots of people around but there are few in the Asura area so I don’t often have help with “events”.   One and a half levels to get to ten, but this is the girl who needs level 25 to get in a dungeon.

Planescape Torment  All this talk of older games made me twitch to play one so I chose Planescape because it spoke to me and because I backed the Kickstarter for Torment: Tides of Numenara and I’d best sharpen up eh?   You know, when you play a single player game it is so different.  It is just you against the game.  Nothing between you and success or failure but your skills.  Deeper worlds and stories.  More complex classes with no whiny “balancing.”   Everyone should go ahead and take a break sometimes and make it just you and your adventuring skills.  And puzzle solving 🙂